The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: COIN spot↔perp, RH-Lighter at 17.9bps (≈$17.88 per $10k, cost ≈5.6bps), US market closed.
Stamped 2026-09-26 15:05 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: COIN spot↔perp · RH-Lighter at 17.9bps (≈$17.88 per $10k, cost ≈5.6bps) · US market closed
pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 3.8bps · beyond-cost 0% · spot rich 100% of the time · 2 never closed · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 7.3bps · beyond-cost 13% · perp rich 87% of the time · 1 gap closed, median 140 min · 1 never closed · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 13.2bps · beyond-cost 67% · perp rich 100% of the time · 3 gaps closed, median 105 min · 4 never closed · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.4bps · beyond-cost 11% · perp rich 69% of the time · 4 gaps closed, median 140 min. Question: Same asset on two books, including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging, do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From Two prices, one asset, run by Coinjure. 4,730 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure