The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: QQQ, RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 20.5bps (≈$20.54 per $10k, cost ≈17.6bps), US market closed.
Stamped 2026-10-24 20:00 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ · RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 20.5bps (≈$20.54 per $10k, cost ≈17.6bps) · US market closed
pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 11.3bps · beyond-cost 38% · spot rich 100% of the time · 4 gaps closed, median 90 min · 11 never closed · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 1.2bps · beyond-cost 0% · spot rich 69% of the time · 3 gaps closed, median 275 min · 7 never closed · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 5.7bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 96% of the time · 26 gaps closed, median 60 min · 15 never closed · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.9bps · beyond-cost 0% · spot rich 56% of the time · 12 gaps closed, median 115 min. Question: Same asset on two books, including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging, do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From Two prices, one asset, run by Coinjure. 4,725 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure