The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: QQQ, RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 14.6bps (≈$14.63 per $10k, cost ≈2.7bps), US market closed.
Stamped 2026-09-28 10:55 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ · RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 14.6bps (≈$14.63 per $10k, cost ≈2.7bps) · US market closed
pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 1.2bps · beyond-cost 0% · spot rich 78% of the time · 2 never closed · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 7.1bps · beyond-cost 1% · perp rich 100% of the time · 1 gap closed, median 140 min · 1 never closed · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 12.2bps · beyond-cost 53% · perp rich 100% of the time · 3 gaps closed, median 105 min · 5 never closed · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.5bps · beyond-cost 9% · perp rich 63% of the time · 8 gaps closed, median 115 min. Question: Same asset on two books, including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging, do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From Two prices, one asset, run by Coinjure. 4,728 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure