The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: QQQ, RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 23.1bps (≈$23.06 per $10k, cost ≈16.7bps), US market closed.
Stamped 2026-10-25 06:05 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ · RH-Lighter ↔ Lighter-Mainnet (spot) at 23.1bps (≈$23.06 per $10k, cost ≈16.7bps) · US market closed
pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 11.3bps · beyond-cost 40% · spot rich 100% of the time · 4 gaps closed, median 90 min · 11 never closed · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 1.1bps · beyond-cost 0% · spot rich 62% of the time · 3 gaps closed, median 275 min · 7 never closed · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 6.6bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 92% of the time · 26 gaps closed, median 60 min · 15 never closed · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 6.0bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 53% of the time · 12 gaps closed, median 115 min. Question: Same asset on two books, including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging, do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From Two prices, one asset, run by Coinjure. 4,728 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure