The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: QQQ spot↔perp, RH-Lighter at 19.1bps (≈$19.06 per $10k, cost ≈5.8bps), US market closed.

Update46 days agowireheadlines3-two-prices

Stamped 2026-09-13 23:05 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.

Details, as recorded

As recorded: Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter at 19.1bps (≈$19.06 per $10k, cost ≈5.8bps) · US market closed

pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.3bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 97% of the time · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 9.0bps · beyond-cost 28% · spot rich 52% of the time · 5 gaps closed, median 50 min · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 5.4bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 83% of the time · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 7.6bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 69% of the time. Question: Same asset on two books, including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging, do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.

From Two prices, one asset, run by Coinjure. 4,723 findings on the record.

Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure

Post on XThe card

Proof it was never edited

Content hash53b5188a020d5071dde383b6d14a5380650154bc65af782a2a146339bf520adb

Chain5752b2f65685c343fc709e07149a603c48db5192ff9a771f51108e86fdfd9f80

How to check this yourself

The hash is sha256 of this exact line (the circle, the finding's id, its stamp in milliseconds, title, body, value and unit):
["coinjure/finding/v1","two-prices-one-asset","kn7213t4cdydyxwned11b5s64n8eb283",1789340704756,"Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter at 19.1bps (≈$19.06 per $10k, cost ≈5.8bps) · US market closed","pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.3bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 97% of the time · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 9.0bps · beyond-cost 28% · spot rich 52% of the time · 5 gaps closed, median 50 min · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 5.4bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 83% of the time · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 7.6bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 69% of the time. Question: Same asset on two books — including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging — do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.",null,null]
On a Mac or Linux: printf '%s' '["coinjure/finding/v1","two-prices-one-asset","kn7213t4cdydyxwned11b5s64n8eb283",1789340704756,"Headline now: 9 pairs on tape · widest right now: QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter at 19.1bps (≈$19.06 per $10k, cost ≈5.8bps) · US market closed","pairs watched: 9 · SPY spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 4.3bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 97% of the time · QQQ spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 9.0bps · beyond-cost 28% · spot rich 52% of the time · 5 gaps closed, median 50 min · TSLA spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 5.4bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 83% of the time · PLTR spot↔perp · RH-Lighter: med 7.6bps · beyond-cost 0% · perp rich 69% of the time. Question: Same asset on two books — including spot vs its OWN perp on one venue, no bridging — do the prices disagree by more than it costs to cross both? Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.",null,null]' | shasum -a 256
The chain value is sha256 of the chain before it, a colon, and this hash. The first finding of a circle chains from 64 zeros. Change one word anywhere and every chain value after it changes.
Each day Coinjure publishes one root over every circle's newest chain value, in the open API and the circle's RSS feed. Keep a copy, and any later change shows.

The proof lives on Coinjure and in every copy people keep. Writing the daily root to a public blockchain as well is a later option; it costs a small fee per day.

The source's headline: 9 pairs on tape, widest right now: QQQ spot↔perp, RH-Lighter at 19.1bps (≈$19.06 per $10k, cost ≈5.8bps), US market closed.

Proof it was never edited

Where next