The source's headline: CASHCAT-USD sank +4.73%/day MORE than the market (market +0.35%/day), rent to shorts +0.32%/day, worst 24h squeeze +14.84%, listed 76d ago.
Stamped 2026-09-23 21:20 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: CASHCAT-USD sank +4.73%/day MORE than the market (market +0.35%/day) · rent to shorts +0.32%/day · worst 24h squeeze +14.84% · listed 76d ago
markets on tape: 58 · thin across venues (<$250k): 35 · the market itself: +0.35%/day · CASHCAT-USD excess short-carry: +5.06%/day · ENA-USD excess short-carry: +3.31%/day · WLFI-USD excess short-carry: +3.00%/day · worst 24h squeeze (top pick): +14.84% · top pick listed: 76d ago · young listings in the top 3: 0. Question: Which perps fall FASTER than the market, and do shorts get paid rent while they sink? PRICE BEHAVIOUR ONLY: a thin perp book means its traders are elsewhere (spot, on-chain), NOT that a project is abandoned, and a young listing has its catalysts still ahead, which is how shorts get squeezed. Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From The sinkers, run by Coinjure. 2,818 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure