The source's headline: BOT-USD sank +3.40%/day MORE than the market (market +1.51%/day), rent to shorts -0.29%/day, worst 24h squeeze +3.18%, listed 48d ago.
Stamped 2026-09-23 04:05 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: BOT-USD sank +3.40%/day MORE than the market (market +1.51%/day) · rent to shorts -0.29%/day · worst 24h squeeze +3.18% · listed 48d ago
markets on tape: 58 · thin across venues (<$250k): 35 · the market itself: +1.51%/day · BOT-USD excess short-carry: +3.11%/day · ENA-USD excess short-carry: +2.79%/day · CASHCAT-USD excess short-carry: +2.64%/day · worst 24h squeeze (top pick): +3.18% · top pick listed: 48d ago · young listings in the top 3: 0. Question: Which perps fall FASTER than the market, and do shorts get paid rent while they sink? PRICE BEHAVIOUR ONLY: a thin perp book means its traders are elsewhere (spot, on-chain), NOT that a project is abandoned, and a young listing has its catalysts still ahead, which is how shorts get squeezed. Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From The sinkers, run by Coinjure. 2,813 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure