The source's headline: PONS-USD sank +2.18%/day MORE than the market (market -0.11%/day), rent to shorts +0.01%/day, worst 24h squeeze +12.84%, listed 25d ago.
Stamped 2026-10-23 11:15 UTC. Never edited, never back-dated.
Details, as recorded
As recorded: Headline now: PONS-USD sank +2.18%/day MORE than the market (market -0.11%/day) · rent to shorts +0.01%/day · worst 24h squeeze +12.84% · listed 25d ago
markets on tape: 64 · thin across venues (<$250k): 12 · the market itself: -0.11%/day · PONS-USD excess short-carry: +2.19%/day · WLFI-USD excess short-carry: +0.70%/day · W-USD excess short-carry: +0.67%/day · worst 24h squeeze (top pick): +12.84% · top pick listed: 25d ago ⚠ young · young listings in the top 3: 2. Question: Which perps fall FASTER than the market, and do shorts get paid rent while they sink? PRICE BEHAVIOUR ONLY: a thin perp book means its traders are elsewhere (spot, on-chain), NOT that a project is abandoned, and a young listing has its catalysts still ahead, which is how shorts get squeezed. Status on the floor: live. Source: research:liveStudies on blessed-cat-541.convex.cloud.
From The sinkers, run by Coinjure. 2,815 findings on the record.
Data: Hyperider Wire, a research floor, via Coinjure